Skip to content
Case study · Test piling

Solar foundation testing, Sweden.

Three days on site. Ground varied from bedrock to clay so soft that piles sank under their own weight. Result: three foundation zones, three different designs.

Location
Sweden
Period
November 2025
Duration
3 days
Site type
Utility-scale solar
Conditions
Bedrock to soft clay
Measurements
58 on-site tests
Outcome
3-zone strategy
Standard
EN 1090

The challenge

The developer needed foundation parameters they could design and quote against. The desk study showed competent ground in some areas and soft material in others, but not where the boundaries ran and not how soft the soft zones really got.

Over-design adds steel everywhere. Under-design fails on the worst rows. The way to draw the line is to install test piles and measure what they do.

What we found in the field

Conditions varied widely across the site. In one part of the area, surface layers were thin but bearing: a usable crust that softened rapidly with depth. In other zones, piles sank under their own weight, with water at the surface, organic material below, and very soft deep clay underneath that. Elsewhere on the same site we hit rock close to surface. Surface water, boulders, and weak bearing made the work demanding, but never unworkable.

The test programme

Three working days, 58 GPS-tagged measurements:

• 12 tension and lateral tests for tracker uplift and wind-load resistance.
• 6 compression tests for vertical capacity in the softest zones.
• 40 torque measurements to map installed-capacity behaviour pile by pile.

The result: three foundation zones

The data didn't support a single foundation type for the whole site. Forcing one would have meant either over-buying steel for soft areas or under-spec'ing the rock zones. The site was divided into three zones, each with its own foundation:

Helical-pile zone (majority of the site). Standard helical-pile foundation, geometry sized to measured soil capacity row by row.
Helical pile + diagonal bracing zone (deep soft clay). Helical piles still carry the load, with a diagonal-bracing detail engineered for the soft profile.
Alternative ground-bearing zone (rocky areas). Where the rock was close to surface, a ground-bearing foundation was the right answer, not a helical pile.

The detailed design now uses measured data. Pile geometry, pile count, and foundation type all change between zones. On-site QA during installation will use the same measurement framework as the testing programme.

From the field

Three days, three soils.

Planning a similar project?

Test before you tender.

Send us project size and location, plus any soil data and plans you have. A preliminary scope and budget for on-site testing comes back, fully confidential. NDA available on request.

More projects
Helicasol field test piling on Irish ground
Ireland · October 2025

Solar foundation testing, Ireland

Three days of on-site test piling on fields and bog. Stony layer at 1.5–2.5 m depth shaped a two-size helical-pile design.

Read case study →
Hallanvahti Solar Park
129 MW · 71,000 piles · Finland

Hallanvahti Solar Park

Finland's second-largest solar park — complete foundation scope across 200+ hectares of peat.

Read case study →
Ypäjä Solar Power Plant — tracker foundation in Nordic conditions
1.5 MWp · tracker · Finland

Ypäjä Solar Power Plant

Complete foundation scope for a 1.5 MWp tracker plant. Helical-pile performance proven in Nordic winter conditions.

Read case study →

A subsidiary of Paalupiste — Europe's most experienced helical-pile manufacturer since 2001