Solar foundation testing, Ireland
Three days of on-site test piling on fields and bog. Stony layer at 1.5–2.5 m depth shaped a two-size helical-pile design.
Read case study →Three days on site. Ground varied from bedrock to clay so soft that piles sank under their own weight. Result: three foundation zones, three different designs.
The developer needed foundation parameters they could design and quote against. The desk study showed competent ground in some areas and soft material in others, but not where the boundaries ran and not how soft the soft zones really got.
Over-design adds steel everywhere. Under-design fails on the worst rows. The way to draw the line is to install test piles and measure what they do.
Conditions varied widely across the site. In one part of the area, surface layers were thin but bearing: a usable crust that softened rapidly with depth. In other zones, piles sank under their own weight, with water at the surface, organic material below, and very soft deep clay underneath that. Elsewhere on the same site we hit rock close to surface. Surface water, boulders, and weak bearing made the work demanding, but never unworkable.
Three working days, 58 GPS-tagged measurements:
• 12 tension and lateral tests for tracker uplift and wind-load resistance.
• 6 compression tests for vertical capacity in the softest zones.
• 40 torque measurements to map installed-capacity behaviour pile by pile.
The data didn't support a single foundation type for the whole site. Forcing one would have meant either over-buying steel for soft areas or under-spec'ing the rock zones. The site was divided into three zones, each with its own foundation:
• Helical-pile zone (majority of the site). Standard helical-pile foundation, geometry sized to measured soil capacity row by row.
• Helical pile + diagonal bracing zone (deep soft clay). Helical piles still carry the load, with a diagonal-bracing detail engineered for the soft profile.
• Alternative ground-bearing zone (rocky areas). Where the rock was close to surface, a ground-bearing foundation was the right answer, not a helical pile.
The detailed design now uses measured data. Pile geometry, pile count, and foundation type all change between zones. On-site QA during installation will use the same measurement framework as the testing programme.
Send us project size and location, plus any soil data and plans you have. A preliminary scope and budget for on-site testing comes back, fully confidential. NDA available on request.
Three days of on-site test piling on fields and bog. Stony layer at 1.5–2.5 m depth shaped a two-size helical-pile design.
Read case study →
Finland's second-largest solar park — complete foundation scope across 200+ hectares of peat.
Read case study →
Complete foundation scope for a 1.5 MWp tracker plant. Helical-pile performance proven in Nordic winter conditions.
Read case study →